1. Is there an unspoken consensus among the leadership in Washington that things are about to get much worse? It would answer some questions which I do not feel have been adequately answered yet, and I do not seem to be alone in this.
2. The rumor that those Senators and perhaps Representatives who voted against the recent bill will not be eligible to serve on the super-committee is disturbing. There is an aspect to it that makes sense, as a whip device, but it doesn’t quite fit there. it looks more like a weapon aimed at splitting or suppressing the Tea Party, in exactly the same way that Democrats use tax hikes to split or suppress the Republican Party.
Obviously, McConnell would like a unified front, but he knows he won’t get one.
If a Republican votes for a tax hike, that erodes support from the right. This is why Democrats strive mightily to bring Republicans on board for even tiny tax hikes–it’s the weakness, not the expense, that dooms weak Republicans. Similarly, if a Tea Party Republican votes for this awful bill, then the Tea Party will rightly savage that guy, and throw him in the same RINO bucket with the likes of Olympia Snowe, whom by the way we have to thank for ObamaCare (at one point, it was up to her, and she folded).
3. Boehner and McConnell seem to have negotiated with their democrat opponents while doing battle against their Tea party allies. This is the same thing that happened during the budget/CR debacle, and I said so at the time. And the first betrayal, the seating of big-spenders like sixteen-term Representative Hal “Prince of Pork” Rogers to important positions on committees that the GOP would be bit players on if not for the Tea Party. Not only does the ideological stance of Rogers rankle, but the things he says about the Tea Party an about government spending are unacceptable.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-gop-appoints-prince-pork-hal-rogers-chair/story?id=12343673 Hal Rogers story from 2008, just after named to chair approps